It seems like I've been waiting on this forever, ever since Labour Day when I happened to chance upon the two recruiters in Burlington. Sometimes I get a small worry that I've oversold this to people. I mean, I had one person in the last week ask me "besides acting, what do you do?" and yet I haven't even been to an audition yet! Still, if ever there was an application of the "act as if" principle, it's this. I'm going to take this one heads on and see where it leads. I'm excited!
Creative people are difficult to place in a capitalist economy. It's probably why so many artists grativate towards socialism or communism: if the basic necessities of life were taken care of by the community, then it would free up artists to explore their craft without fear of homelessness or starvation, whatever it might be. I can definitely see that appeal. Sadly, while that could be the way things go in the future, at the present, creative men and women are still having to wait tables, serve coffee, lug boxes, or push paper in offices to support the basics of life to follow their dreams.
When they do succeed, though, they succeed big. It's the difference between Harrison Ford the Carpenter - the job he held to pay the bills; he'd met George Lucas when the director hired him to fix his cabinets - and Harrison Ford the A-List Film Star. If you look at the percentages of artists living almost obscene affluence thanks to their craft and those struggling for rent and food....well, I'd rather not. As one of Ford's more famous characters, Han Solo, once remarked:
"Never tell me the odds."
Off the top of my head, I've held something like nine jobs in my fourteen year work history. Two were logistics clerk positions; one was a warehouse co-ordinator for a marketing company; one was as an office customer service rep; two were pure administrative clerical gigs; two were as a warehouse material handler; one was as a virtual concierge (in an office, but not doing administration); and one was in sales.
Out of the nine, I was happiest in the concierge and the sales gigs. I only left the concierge for the better shift and pay of government work, and - I'll admit - the presence of a union to keep the man at bay (my new thoughts on unions are a whole other entry altogether). I only stopped working the sales job because the company itself was shady and disintegrated, resulting in a layoff (I enjoyed the work, though).
I liked them because they appealed to my creativity, because they challenged me to think outside the box, to use my unique talents. It's a satisfaction I can't get in government. Here, there is nothing outside the box. The box is everything.
There's a lingering convention in the way Western culture - and the American workforce paradigm in particular - views careers, and that's the idea that you're supposed to find one career for life. It's that 1950s ideal of the man who works for a loyal company, for fair compensation, who gets rewarded for his efforts if he shows effort. He sticks with the company for 40 years, then retires with a good pension.
Flashforward to the Great Recession...hell, even before. The 1950s vision is only a memory, and a laughable one at that. Not only has the economy grown more unstable, but several new work paradigms have emerged. One of them suits the artist very well: the job as a growth experience, as a stepping stone.
You start a job with a great level of excitement, stay as long as the gumption stays with you. Enjoy your time. When the gumption runs out, and the job feels like an existential drag, or when you no longer see any chances to move up, start finding something else. Send out the resumes, do the interviews, and when you get an offer for a new place, tender your resignation at the old, and start again.
In a way, it's more natural than sticking with the same job for decades. In nature, there are many species of fauna that will habitate one place for a while, and then migrate to greener pastures when the habitat no longer supports them. Western culture, for all its greatness which I do admire and defend, seems wont to impose artificial expectations on work, as it does other aspects of life. Why should anyone stick with something long after it's outlived its usefulness? When it not only stops providing satisfaction and a feeling of purpose and belonging, but actually starts working against your happiness?
The reflex of the traditionalists, of course, is to slap back with the other extreme: you don't want a string of fifteen jobs on a resume. You don't want to show you're non-committal. To them, I say this: employers are non-committal. Way more than their workers. They won't hesitate to let you go if it serves their interests. You shouldn't hesitate to drop them in favour of something new if they no longer serve your interests, as long as you do so in a professional manner that prevents too much damage on either side of the arrangement.
When we say we're in a new economic reality, we need to appreciate that this reality now changes on a daily basis, not a generational one. Most of the gray hairs for whom I work and who still cling to the old 1950s vision of career will never accept that, nor will their younger disciples for whom life has indeed been a straight and narrow path of relative ease. Adaptability and knowing when to leap are two qualities I'd advise any young person entering the workforce to develop, no matter what they studied in school, at no matter what level.
Above all, I say to these kids: don't look for your career to define you as it has previous generations. Instead, try to resist the tendency to label yourself and others you'll meet by what they do, and focus instead on the experience of life as a whole, in which "career" is only one thread in the tapestry.
Your career, like your relationships, like your health, like other parts of your life, should all have one thing in common: they should be accurate reflections of the strongest version of Who You Are. Present tense. That is, they put you in the zone and give you a zest for life, make you excited to wake up in the morning to face the new day. Doesn't matter what the job is, whether it's in your trained field or not, as long as it contributes to your overall joy. When it stops doing so, look for something else that's more in line with Who You Are, however you define it, wherever you find it.
I'm mindful that I'm now as excited about acting as I was about starting my current job, as I had been about the virtual concierge, about many of the jobs that ended up burning me out over the years. I haven't left my day job, and don't plan on it, for all of the shortcomings it has of low creative satisfaction and the social isolation. But I'm no lifer: my boss knows that, and if this new adventure turns out to be lucrative and personally fulfilling enough, I'd be silly to stick with a sure thing that fails to satisfy on both counts.
How this turns out remains to be seen. That's why it's called "risk". Stay tuned.
***UPDATE: For those of you who have expressed concern, even criticism, that I shouldn't write this for fear that current and future employers may Google me, read this. Frankly, any employer who would seek that much control over my thoughts and feelings does not deserve my services.












